This Blog is a part of my classroom activity.
1) How
far do you agree with the India represented in the novel 'The White
Tiger'?
Arvind
Adiga portrayed lighter and darker picture of India in his novel.
Adiga's novel is divided India into two distinct zone-Darkness and
light. As the protagonist initially inform the premier-
'I
am in light now, but I was born and raised in darkness.'(14,The White
Tiger)
Adiga also talk about the
Indian education system and corrupt roots of India. Our education
system in the 'darkness' is made up of schools where a teacher's
primary focus is not in teaching, but in earn money by corruption and
by dishonesty. Another feature of darkness of India is elections. Where vote of people was counted even the people don't gave their
vote and don't know about that anything. Adiga also portrayed Indian
political system, judiciary, Police, administrative officers,
political leaders all have different slandered for the elite and
different once for the economically deprived. Adiga employs the
'rooster coop' analogy to his vision of enslaved Indian Masses,social
life and ridicule of Indian Marriage.
2)
Do you believe that Balram's story is the archetype of all stories of
'Rags to Riches'?
Yes,
this story is the archetype of all stories of 'Rags to riches', but
at some extent. Stories like Balram it, gives hope to the poor people
that they also can grow up. Most of the successful stories deals with
the idea of 'Think big' and 'Dream big' or 'Think differently'. But
Balram done bad things (murder) to become rich. But may be not
everyone who get success they done bad, that is may be their hard work
also. If we think on the side of post modernism way, then we can say
that Balram has his own new morality then it is a archetypal story
from 'Rags to rices'. We can apply the idea of 'Dhirubhaism' as a good
example of the story of rages to riches and also the movie 'Slumdog
Millionaire' also show Jamal Malik's story of become rags to riches.
3)
“Language
bears within itself the necessity of its own critique, deconstructive
criticism aims to show that any text inevitably undermines its own
claims to have a determinate meaning, and licences the reader to
produce his own meanings out of it by an activity of semantic
'freeplay' (Derrida, 1978, in Lodge, 1988, p. 108). Is it
possible to do deconstructive reading of The White Tiger? How?
Yes, it is possible
to do deconstruction of the text 'The White Tiger.'
'Me,
and thousands of others in this country like me, are half-baked, because we were never allowed to complete our schooling'.
By
this line
spoken
by Balram Halwai, by half-baked who present the critical ideas about
India, we can not surley believe on that Ideas that it is really true
of false? By this point we can deconstruct it.
4)
It is possible to read 'The
White Tiger' in context
of the Globalization?
“For
surley any successful man must spill a little blood on his way to the
top”.
From
this line we can say that in our society rich people ruled on poor
people and that's why the poor feels inferior and for become rich
they d something wrong like Balram. Balram worked as a servant and
that's why he know the situation of servant and master- slave
relationship. He also help his driver when his driver kill one person
by accident, that time Balram save him. In globalized India rich
people become richer
and poor become more poor. There is only two destinies : eat or
eaten up. It means you have to survive your self otherwise serve
others. Many people like Balram in India they do something bad/wrong
for become a rich in the globelized India.

No comments:
Post a Comment