Sharmeen and
Arvind Adiga both show the reality and dirty image of their nation. Sharmeen
shows the reality of women killing for honor of family and Arvind Adiga
portrayed the harsh reality of India. There is an argued against Arvind Adiga
that why he portrayed ugly and negative image of India, Rather than good or
Positive side of India? People want admiration of Western people. They thought
that if we portrayed negative image of our country then the Western will never
wants to come in our country. There is an interesting example of the film based
on Nirbhaya rape case. This film was banned by government of India. The reason
behind it that if the Westerns know that the things like rape happened more in India then they never
like to come in India. But the people like Malala, Denny Boyle, Arvind Adiga
and Sharmeen who portrayed the reality of their nation. Their purpose is only
to tell the truth and reality. Shrmeen’s film are about truly heroic have
suffered appealing cruelty and oppression but who have refused to be silenced.
The
hundreds of women are murdered every year for honor, yet it’s taken the buzz
that Shrmeen’s single film has generated abroat to promote Nawas Sharif’s
avowal to put an end to honor killing at home and embolden Imran Khan to publically
decry the practice, I am completely agree with her words that if we find that
these stories shame us then we must do something about them. But for those of
us still fixated on the image issue, it’s quite simple really, you want better
PR? Improve the Product.

No comments:
Post a Comment